If only I had a sledgehammer…
An excerpt from my letter to Jane Ganahl (author of “When he says he’s bisexual, what does he really mean?” and her editors:
I feel that your article is a product of stereotypes and that it also serves to propagate and inflame those stereotypes. You may have written your article with a desire to shed light on a controversial subject, or to bring your own experiences out to offer your own insight, but you have only succeeded in reinforcing those damaging stereotypes.Your friend Michael may have been gay and used the term “bisexual” to slowly ease into his homosexual lifestyle. This is not an uncommon occurrence by any means, however your failure to acknowledge bisexuality as a legitimate sexual orientation leads your readers to believe that being bisexual is nothing but a “half-way” house between one orientation or another, or worse, that it is merely a sign of a person’s indecisiveness, sexual hedonism or, in the case of female bisexuality, only for the pornographic pleasure of males.
This article has been posted in twice in the last week or so, and I only now read the entire thing. Sure, columns are supposed to be the opinions of the author, but what about when the author’s work is socially damaging? What about if it inflames stereotypes? What if some of the information is simply not true or it is unsupported and so completely vague that any thinking reader has to stop and say “what are you trying to say with this?” (example: “Studies show that a huge number of young women have experimented sexually with other women; the result, it’s speculated, of the women’s movement and the rise in appreciation for all things female.” heh heh. this is when ben suggested that she should be fired from thinking.)
*sigh* What has journalism come to these days? Negative 3,452 Respect Points are hereby awarded to the San Francisco Chronicle.







