<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pill pms crap</title>
	<link>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/</link>
	<description>Thrilling heroics at an affordable price.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cara Fletcher</title>
		<link>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-61704</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-61704</guid>
					<description>The problem with the birth control is huge.I started taking some ovulation kits and also some pills for controlling my cycle and for now there are no side effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the birth control is huge.I started taking some ovulation kits and also some pills for controlling my cycle and for now there are no side effects.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: starladear6</title>
		<link>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-750</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 14:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-750</guid>
					<description>I'm pretty sure that it doesn't stop the lining from growing.  Remember Seasonale? That recent pill that was on TV all the time saying it was the first one to let a woman have just 4 periods a year?  They recently &lt;a href="http://www.pharmcast.com/WarningLetters/Yr2004/Dec2004/Barr1204.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;got busted&lt;/a&gt; by the FDA for not disclosing the risks properly, and for being misleading.  (break-through bleeding, which basically means "you still have a pretty normal period only you have no idea when it will happen" was still common in trials. that != only 4 periods.)

My doctor told me that a woman must have at least 4 bleeds a year or she risks various kinds of uterine cancer, no matter what kinds of hormones you take.

I doubt that drug that's up for FDA approval will get approved.  And if it does, I'm sure any doctor who has any sense will realize how little research/understanding about women's cycles exists and not trust it. (They don't even know what causes or how to actually treat polycystic ovarian syndrom!)

I did google and google and found some medications that claim they can eliminate periods, but none that I found listed the health risks, and all of them said break-through bleeding was still relatively common. Most of them involved two kinds of birth control used simultaneously (pills+ring), which means they're hella incovenient too.

Anyway, you just encouraged me to get my BC education.  This was fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that it doesn&#8217;t stop the lining from growing.  Remember Seasonale? That recent pill that was on TV all the time saying it was the first one to let a woman have just 4 periods a year?  They recently <a href="http://www.pharmcast.com/WarningLetters/Yr2004/Dec2004/Barr1204.htm" rel="nofollow">got busted</a> by the FDA for not disclosing the risks properly, and for being misleading.  (break-through bleeding, which basically means &#8220;you still have a pretty normal period only you have no idea when it will happen&#8221; was still common in trials. that != only 4 periods.)</p>
<p>My doctor told me that a woman must have at least 4 bleeds a year or she risks various kinds of uterine cancer, no matter what kinds of hormones you take.</p>
<p>I doubt that drug that&#8217;s up for FDA approval will get approved.  And if it does, I&#8217;m sure any doctor who has any sense will realize how little research/understanding about women&#8217;s cycles exists and not trust it. (They don&#8217;t even know what causes or how to actually treat polycystic ovarian syndrom!)</p>
<p>I did google and google and found some medications that claim they can eliminate periods, but none that I found listed the health risks, and all of them said break-through bleeding was still relatively common. Most of them involved two kinds of birth control used simultaneously (pills+ring), which means they&#8217;re hella incovenient too.</p>
<p>Anyway, you just encouraged me to get my BC education.  This was fun.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: autarchex</title>
		<link>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-749</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 06:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-749</guid>
					<description>Apparently I was a little confused about the timeline of the product designed to eliminate them entirely.  They are filing for FDA approval this year, so I guess it isn't even available yet.  Kind of makes me wonder where the hell I saw it... I thought it was in a newspaper ad, but I can't see a company advertising a product they haven't put into production yet.

http://www.wyeth.com/news/Pressed_and_Released/pr06_02_2004_09_39_48.asp

And as for the creative uses of pills not designed for this, I'm by no means knowledgable on the subject, and I'm sure you know more about it than I do.  It was just my impression from friends that they didn't have any periods, &lt;i&gt;period&lt;/i&gt; (pun definitely intended :)  I suppose I could have misunderstood, of course.  I was told that with most types of the pill, you could just replace the week of blanks with actives from another pack.  The rationale being, as noted by the source below, that:

"&lt;i&gt;With continuous hormonal use the lining of the uterus does not thicken and thus there is nothing or very little for the uterus to empty.&lt;/i&gt;

http://www.fwhc.org/birth-control/continual-hormones.htm

Of course, I'm not sure how reliable that information is, since a quick google review of at least semi-respectable-looking medical sites seems to come up about 50-50 on the issue of whether or not the uterine lining thickens while on the pill.

Either way, due to my inherent laziness, I've given up delving deeper into that mystery, favoring sleep instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently I was a little confused about the timeline of the product designed to eliminate them entirely.  They are filing for FDA approval this year, so I guess it isn&#8217;t even available yet.  Kind of makes me wonder where the hell I saw it&#8230; I thought it was in a newspaper ad, but I can&#8217;t see a company advertising a product they haven&#8217;t put into production yet.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.wyeth.com/news/Pressed_and_Released/pr06_02_2004_09_39_48.asp' rel='nofollow'>http://www.wyeth.com/news/Pressed_and_Released/pr06_02_2004_09_39_48.asp</a></p>
<p>And as for the creative uses of pills not designed for this, I&#8217;m by no means knowledgable on the subject, and I&#8217;m sure you know more about it than I do.  It was just my impression from friends that they didn&#8217;t have any periods, <i>period</i> (pun definitely intended :)  I suppose I could have misunderstood, of course.  I was told that with most types of the pill, you could just replace the week of blanks with actives from another pack.  The rationale being, as noted by the source below, that:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>With continuous hormonal use the lining of the uterus does not thicken and thus there is nothing or very little for the uterus to empty.</i></p>
<p><a href='http://www.fwhc.org/birth-control/continual-hormones.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.fwhc.org/birth-control/continual-hormones.htm</a></p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m not sure how reliable that information is, since a quick google review of at least semi-respectable-looking medical sites seems to come up about 50-50 on the issue of whether or not the uterine lining thickens while on the pill.</p>
<p>Either way, due to my inherent laziness, I&#8217;ve given up delving deeper into that mystery, favoring sleep instead.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: starladear6</title>
		<link>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-748</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 06:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-748</guid>
					<description>I think you're misunderstanding whoever told you that.  Or they were exaggerating.

They can't do that with the pill anyway.  There is breakthrough bleeding after a few months because the lining gets too thick.  if it gets infected, you're fucked, so no doctor would ever give a girl BC without explaining that she needs to menstruate.  

The pills don't stop the lining from forming, so there must be menstruation. they just stop ovulation, or implantation depending on which type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re misunderstanding whoever told you that.  Or they were exaggerating.</p>
<p>They can&#8217;t do that with the pill anyway.  There is breakthrough bleeding after a few months because the lining gets too thick.  if it gets infected, you&#8217;re fucked, so no doctor would ever give a girl BC without explaining that she needs to menstruate.  </p>
<p>The pills don&#8217;t stop the lining from forming, so there must be menstruation. they just stop ovulation, or implantation depending on which type.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: autarchex</title>
		<link>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-747</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 04:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pennyhero.net/2005/05/18/pill-pms-crap/#comment-747</guid>
					<description>Still, plenty of people use them to be rid of it altogether, whether it is healthy or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, plenty of people use them to be rid of it altogether, whether it is healthy or not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
